Comments on: What’s the best Climate Change Documentary Film Can we make? http://www.aspectmediafactory.com/documentary-films/whats-the-best-climate-change-documentary-film-can-we-make Documentary Films, Commercial Advertising, New Media, Production, Post-Production Sat, 19 May 2012 04:08:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: SEX EXPERT! http://www.aspectmediafactory.com/documentary-films/whats-the-best-climate-change-documentary-film-can-we-make/comment-page-1#comment-7027 SEX EXPERT! Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:42:59 +0000 http://www.aspectmediafactory.com/documentary-films/whats-the-best-climate-change-documentary-film-can-we-make#comment-7027 ACT 1 One about how people were led into believing the climate is warming up and the environment has or is going to change in a drastic way where humans will be wiped off the face of the Earth. ACT 2 How everything in ACT 1 was bogus and how it was uncovered and proven false. Act 3 The court cases suing for damages and the criminal charges filed and the time people are serving. And the end of the respect given to Nobel Peace prize winners is lost.<br><b>References : </b><br> ACT 1
One about how people were led into believing the climate is warming up and the environment has or is going to change in a drastic way where humans will be wiped off the face of the Earth.
ACT 2
How everything in ACT 1 was bogus and how it was uncovered and proven false.
Act 3
The court cases suing for damages and the criminal charges filed and the time people are serving. And the end of the respect given to Nobel Peace prize winners is lost.
References :

]]> By: NW Jack http://www.aspectmediafactory.com/documentary-films/whats-the-best-climate-change-documentary-film-can-we-make/comment-page-1#comment-7026 NW Jack Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:57:59 +0000 http://www.aspectmediafactory.com/documentary-films/whats-the-best-climate-change-documentary-film-can-we-make#comment-7026 It seems appropriate for you to couch AGW in religious terms. While the AGW advocates use science to advance their cause, the science falls short, and they make up the difference with faith based methods. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_consensus AGW requires some religious thinking to truly grasp it. http://www.johnpratt.com/items/docs/lds/meridian/2005/sci_rel_qa.html To scientifically support the AGW theory, you need to provide evidence for the AGW articles of faith: 1) The earth is currently in a warming phase. The problem is that satellite measurements have failed to show a clear trend over the last decade (TLC for near surface): http://www.ssmi.com/msu/msu_data_description.html#msu_amsu_time_series 2) The warming is caused by high levels of CO2. http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/File:Atmospheric_Absorption_Bands_png The problem is that high CO2 concentrations are associated with cooling phases of the earth's climate: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/01/30/co2-temperatures-and-ice-ages/ 3) The rise in the CO2 concentration from 0.028% to 0.039% of the atmosphere is caused by man's burning of fossil fuels, and not the effect of a rise in the temperature of the ocean. http://www2.canada.com/components/print.aspx?id=433b593b-6637-4a42-970b-bdef8947fa4e The problem is that measurements done in the 1800's do not support that thesis: 1878: CO2 = 344 ppm 1880: CO2 = 271 ppm http://www.springerlink.com/content/t7h40g8355613013/?p=39b2395f1a8e43e5b1acb6d5c2ad8e2f&pi=1 4) The current temperature of the earth is historically unprecedented: http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/McKitrick-hockeystick.pdf Historians sing a different tune: http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/lia/vikings_during_mwp.html So do scientists who study ancient flora and fauna: http://www.co2science.org/data/mwp/mwpp.php 5) If the earth continues to warm, it will be a disaster. The evidence supports just the opposite. There will not be more terrible weather. There is no good indication that this will affect the pandemic rate. The oceans are not rising at an alarming rate. Glaciers and sea ice are not going away globally. Agriculture would benefit, and might be able to keep up with our growing population a little longer if global warming actually happens. 6) Governments can and should control the climate. There is no reason to believe that government action will affect the climate on earth any more that it would on the surface of the sun. The draconian measures being proposed by governments are highly controversial.<br><b>References : </b><br>Global Warming in the past: http://www.rense.com/general88/warming.htm Sea Level Risings are not a serious problem: http://sealevel.colorado.edu/ Sea Ice is not disappearing: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/ Glaciers not going away anytime soon: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1245636/Glacier-scientists-says-knew-data-verified.html Where warming is projected to happen by AGW models would be a boon to agriculture: http://www.ipcc.ch/graphics/syr/spm6.jpg What Obama wants to do about AGW: http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=26496 The predicted distruction of the US economy by Obama's AGW program: http://boortz.com/nealz_nuze/2009/05/the-capandtrade-scam.html The predicted corruption of foreign governments by Obama's AGW program: http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:gZzKvikaaakJ:en.cop15.dk/news/view%2Bnews%3Fnewsid%3D2955+paying+developing+nations+not+to+develop&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us It seems appropriate for you to couch AGW in religious terms. While the AGW advocates use science to advance their cause, the science falls short, and they make up the difference with faith based methods.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_consensus
AGW requires some religious thinking to truly grasp it.
http://www.johnpratt.com/items/docs/lds/meridian/2005/sci_rel_qa.html

To scientifically support the AGW theory, you need to provide evidence for the AGW articles of faith:

1) The earth is currently in a warming phase. The problem is that satellite measurements have failed to show a clear trend over the last decade (TLC for near surface):
http://www.ssmi.com/msu/msu_data_description.html#msu_amsu_time_series

2) The warming is caused by high levels of CO2.
http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/File:Atmospheric_Absorption_Bands_png
The problem is that high CO2 concentrations are associated with cooling phases of the earth’s climate:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/01/30/co2-temperatures-and-ice-ages/

3) The rise in the CO2 concentration from 0.028% to 0.039% of the atmosphere is caused by man’s burning of fossil fuels, and not the effect of a rise in the temperature of the ocean.
http://www2.canada.com/components/print.aspx?id=433b593b-6637-4a42-970b-bdef8947fa4e
The problem is that measurements done in the 1800’s do not support that thesis:
1878: CO2 = 344 ppm
1880: CO2 = 271 ppm
http://www.springerlink.com/content/t7h40g8355613013/?p=39b2395f1a8e43e5b1acb6d5c2ad8e2f&pi=1

4) The current temperature of the earth is historically unprecedented:
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/McKitrick-hockeystick.pdf
Historians sing a different tune:
http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/lia/vikings_during_mwp.html
So do scientists who study ancient flora and fauna:
http://www.co2science.org/data/mwp/mwpp.php

5) If the earth continues to warm, it will be a disaster. The evidence supports just the opposite. There will not be more terrible weather. There is no good indication that this will affect the pandemic rate. The oceans are not rising at an alarming rate. Glaciers and sea ice are not going away globally. Agriculture would benefit, and might be able to keep up with our growing population a little longer if global warming actually happens.

6) Governments can and should control the climate. There is no reason to believe that government action will affect the climate on earth any more that it would on the surface of the sun. The draconian measures being proposed by governments are highly controversial.
References :
Global Warming in the past:
http://www.rense.com/general88/warming.htm
Sea Level Risings are not a serious problem:
http://sealevel.colorado.edu/
Sea Ice is not disappearing:
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/
Glaciers not going away anytime soon:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1245636/Glacier-scientists-says-knew-data-verified.html
Where warming is projected to happen by AGW models would be a boon to agriculture:
http://www.ipcc.ch/graphics/syr/spm6.jpg
What Obama wants to do about AGW:
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=26496
The predicted distruction of the US economy by Obama’s AGW program:
http://boortz.com/nealz_nuze/2009/05/the-capandtrade-scam.html
The predicted corruption of foreign governments by Obama’s AGW program:
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:gZzKvikaaakJ:en.cop15.dk/news/view%2Bnews%3Fnewsid%3D2955+paying+developing+nations+not+to+develop&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

]]> By: Texas http://www.aspectmediafactory.com/documentary-films/whats-the-best-climate-change-documentary-film-can-we-make/comment-page-1#comment-7025 Texas Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:44:59 +0000 http://www.aspectmediafactory.com/documentary-films/whats-the-best-climate-change-documentary-film-can-we-make#comment-7025 The best film would be documenting how the prospect of Global Warming convinced Al Gore to become a Vegetarian, as Meat produces about 10 times as much carbon as veggies, and if he's serious this would be the most effective documentary evidence he could provide to support his case.<br><b>References : </b><br> The best film would be documenting how the prospect of Global Warming convinced Al Gore to become a Vegetarian, as Meat produces about 10 times as much carbon as veggies, and if he’s serious this would be the most effective documentary evidence he could provide to support his case.
References :

]]> By: John http://www.aspectmediafactory.com/documentary-films/whats-the-best-climate-change-documentary-film-can-we-make/comment-page-1#comment-7024 John Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:30:59 +0000 http://www.aspectmediafactory.com/documentary-films/whats-the-best-climate-change-documentary-film-can-we-make#comment-7024 Since you have started from the beginning of creation ,you could actually depict the development/changes/harm in the environment that have taken place during each century till the present century. Wishing you all the best for your documentary.<br><b>References : </b><br> Since you have started from the beginning of creation ,you could actually depict the development/changes/harm in the environment that have taken place during each century
till the present century.

Wishing you all the best for your documentary.
References :

]]> By: Lizz http://www.aspectmediafactory.com/documentary-films/whats-the-best-climate-change-documentary-film-can-we-make/comment-page-1#comment-7023 Lizz Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:19:59 +0000 http://www.aspectmediafactory.com/documentary-films/whats-the-best-climate-change-documentary-film-can-we-make#comment-7023 Mention how fake Global Warming is then point the camera at the snow.<br><b>References : </b><br> Mention how fake Global Warming is then point the camera at the snow.
References :

]]>